🔗 Share this article

Whenever a major prize-giving event draws close, one notices a clamor for the addition additional classifications to honor unsung work and delight the passions of enthusiasts with niche passions.

My colleague previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are board games, representing someone's personal cause. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand is the most urgent above others. This is the request: We need an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and typically spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why movie academies don’t do it. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise for the industry of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these award types successfully include a lot of ground, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Not so for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to accommodate them. Consider three of this year’s best games, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition from another release, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games launched regularly without proper recognition at major award shows, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging Indie races.

• An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition in any category that year
• A different innovative game received no nominations in 2019
• Well-received sorting experience was overlooked recently
• Just some logic titles scraped into niche award types

Importance of Logic Titles

These are often small games, however the design in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games stand as the most-played games globally maintaining this status for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience challenges popular creative games for the title of most purchased experience; it also contends as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have such difficulty. One could readily select a field of five interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

Restating the point, these are games without proper classification during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers are working at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. Don't make them wait 35 years.